高级检索

    不同装烟方式对密集烘烤效率及烟叶质量的影响

    Effects of Loading Modes on Flue-curing Efficiency and Leaf Quality of Tobacco

    • 摘要: 为探索现代烟草农业减工降本措施,通过烘烤试验,对梳式烟夹、散叶烟筐、散叶插扦、箱式堆积和常规烟竿5种装烟方式的烘烤效率、省工节能效果及烤后烟叶的经济性状、内在质量进行了研究。结果表明,与常规烟竿装烟方式相比,梳式烟夹、散叶烟筐、散叶插扦和箱式堆积装烟方式均能提高编装卸解烟效率,降低烘烤环节用工成本。梳式烟夹烤后烟叶回潮效率和常规烟竿基本相当,均高于散叶烟筐、散叶插扦和箱式堆积方式。梳式烟夹、散叶烟筐和散叶插扦装烟烘烤能耗低于常规烟竿,而箱式堆积装烟烘烤能耗高于常规烟竿。在烤后烟叶经济性状、化学成分协调性与感官质量方面,梳式烟夹装烟与常规烟竿基本相当,散叶烟筐和散叶插扦略低,而箱式堆积烤后烟叶经济性状和内在质量在5种装烟方式中最差。

       

      Abstract: In order to investigate the measures of saving labor force and energy during the development of tobacco agricultural modernization, the experiment of loading tobacco leaf was conducted with five treatments (loading leaf with clip, loose-leaf with frame, loose-leaf with skewer, loose-leaf with large box and traditional loading leaf with pole). The results showed that four loading modes (loading leaf with clip, loose-leaf with frame, loose-leaf with skewer and loose-leaf with large box) raised working efficiency, decreased the cost of labor force compared with the traditional loading mode. The leaf conditioning efficiencies of loading leaf with clip and traditional loading leaf with pole were similar, and higher than other three loading modes. The energy cost during curing of traditional loading leaf with pole was higher than loading leaf with clip, loose-leaf with frame and loose-leaf with skewer but lower than loose-leaf with large box. The difference of the economic characters, contents of chemical components and smoking quality of curing leaves between loading leaf with clip and traditional loading leaf with pole was inconspicuous, while loose-leaf with frame and loose-leaf with skewer were worse than traditional loading leaf with pole. Curing leaves of loose-leaf with large box exhibited the worst economic characters and smoking quality in all loading modes.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回